Salem Film Fest 2012!

October 5th, 2011

The fifth annual Salem Film Fest is coming, March 1-8, 2012! As you read these words, the Selection Committee is watching screeners and contacting filmmakers, volunteers are hanging posters around downtown Salem, and the Organizing Committee is putting the finishing touches on a preliminary schedule of great parties, filmmaker forums, and musical performances to complement another stunning roster of the world’s best documentaries.

Already New England’s largest all-documentary film festival, the late-winter, early-spring event is beginning to draw a national audience. You can be part of the excitement by checking back here over the next five months. We’ll be updating you on the film schedule, tracking the growing list of visiting filmmakers, and reporting on partnerships with sponsors and other arts organizations, all of which make the Salem Film Fest the engrossing, provocative, and fun community festival it’s become.

So check back often!

The Audiences have Spoken…

March 10th, 2011

Salem Film Fest Audience Award Winner: LOUDER THAN A BOMB,dir. Greg Jacobs & Jon Siskel

 

As the lights rose in the main theater of Cinema Salem Thursday night, and people filed out of the final film of the 2011 Salem Film Fest, there was only one piece of business left to address. Volunteers quickly gathered the final ballots to determine which film audiences felt was the most outstanding and the votes are in.

The winner of the 2011 Salem Film Fest’s Audience Award is LOUDER THAN A BOMB, a film which follows high school poets who capture the joy and pain of growing up with verse while competing in the world’s largest youth slam poetry contest.

Directors Greg Jacobs and Jon Siskel went into Chicago high schools and followed the young participants for a year as they prepared to compete in “Louder than a Bomb”, a high school poetry slam competition that sees over 600 contestants every year. Students were then put to the test as they created and collaborated to produce slam poems that not only moved their teammates, but the judges as well.

The documentary showed at the festival Saturday night, and several of the film’s subjects took the stage following the screening to answer audience questions and perform an impromptu slam to the audience’s great approval.

Throughout the festival, as crowds arrived and took their seats, festival volunteers handed out simple paper ballots printed with the movie’s title and the numbers 1 – 6. Audiences were then told that at the end of the film, they simply need to tear the number they rated the film, 1 being poor and 6 for outstanding. Volunteers then vigilantly collected the ballots and kept a record of each film’s final total.

And as the popcorn is cleared from the aisles, and the last volunteer heads home, the final total is in: the 2011 Salem Film Fest Audience Award Winner is LOUDER THAN A BOMB.

A Look Back at GROWN IN DETROIT: Raising Hope from the Soil

March 10th, 2011

GROWN IN DETROIT; dir. Mascha & Manfred Poppenk

by Sarah Wolfe

“Detroit is a sleeping woman,” says poet Starlet Lee. She once ‘stopped traffic with her beauty, paid her bills, took care of her kids,’ feeding them “healthy, happy, organic meals;” and owned land “very well, juicy and alive.”

“I hope Detroit wakes up out of this coma,” Lee says. “We can’t let her die.”

Woven with images of empty lots reclaimed by nature, this opening poem sets the stage for Mascha and Manfred Poppenk’s GROWN IN DETROIT with its themes of hope and renewal. The film made its New England debut Saturday at the National Park Service Visitor Center, followed by a sold-out Tuesday viewing in CinemaSalem’s screening room.

The “coma” Lee refers to comes from the departure of more than half of Detroit’s population in the last 50 years due to a struggling auto industry and race riots. What’s left behind: high rates of unemployment, poverty and teen pregnancy; more liquor stores than supermarkets, and a reputation as one of America’s most dangerous municipalities. Within these circumstances, however, a movement is afoot to convert vacant lots into urban farms, giving the community fresh, local produce and income. GROWN IN DETROIT centers on the involvement of Catherine Ferguson Academy, one of only three public high schools nationwide for pregnant or parenting girls. The 300 mainly African-American students arrive with their children each day in pursuit of a diploma, receiving support from passionate teachers and an inspiring principal. As part of the curriculum, the girls are taught agricultural skills on the school’s farm, learning to become more independent and knowledgeable about the importance healthy, organically-grown foods play in the lives of their children and themselves. The principal’s goal is to find more farmable plots so the girls can make a larger profit and support their families.

“There’s so much bad news, so to see something so hopeful ─ so encouraging, was great,” said viewer Anne Marie Martin after Tuesday’s show, adding with a chuckle, “I was almost jealous of their farm, I only have one garden plot!”

 

A positive focus

GROWN IN DETROIT is laden with warmth and humor as well as striking imagery, like a school hallway strewn with baby strollers, a young girl’s hand resting on her pregnant belly while she listens to a lesson, and lush vegetables lined up at a market. Viewers Lloyd Ternes and Kathleen Keefe Ternes noted that while some filmmakers might’ve chosen grittier images of Detroit, showing the inner city rather than the outskirts St. Catherine’s is located in, the Poppenks opted for a more subtle approach that stayed focused on the school.

“They wanted us to see the school’s potential,” said Lloyd, a native of the Detroit area. “It was fascinating to learn what they did with the kids with so few means and minimal capital.”

The tougher sides of Detroit were instead portrayed through statistics displayed on screen, vacant lots with hollowed-out homes and footage of the single teenaged mothers ─ some of them already with two children, who tell the principal they’ve seen violence, murders and drug dealing. To compare the farm’s healthy fare to the junk food those on survival mode often eat, the filmmakers show a corner store.

“That really summed it up well,” said viewer Perry Hallinan. “It was one of the alcohol-carrying stores that outnumber supermarkets. You see people buying unhealthy, processed food while vegetables are rotting on the shelves.”

Throughout the film we watch the girls, some resistant at first, come to understand the importance of good nutrition as well as the financial benefit of growing and selling locally in a city where more than one third live below the poverty level. As one student said during an in-class urban farming presentation, “I think everyone should do it.”

GROWN IN DETROIT is a fascinating look at this “back-to-the-roots” movement, and it leaves us with a sense of hope for Detroit and other cities hit by hard times.

Learn more about the film and where you can see it next at  http://www.grownindetroit.filmmij.nl/

A Look Back at AMERICAN JIHADIST: Escaping a Simple Definition

March 8th, 2011

AMERICAN JIHADIST; dir. Mark Claywell

by Sarah Wolfe

If director Mark Claywell’s AMERICAN JIHADIST proves one thing, it’s there are no easy answers to why someone chooses radicalism. The story of Isa Abdullah Ali, aka Clevin Raphael Holt, is “very shades of gray,” as viewer Toni Ponte expressed following Sunday’s premiere at CinemaSalem.

“I thought it was going to be a much simpler story – why he hates Christians, etc.,” Dan Liebert added. “It wasn’t so clear cut, though.”

AMERICAN JIHADIST explores the social, economic and political environments that create a jihadist, especially an African-American one from Washington, D.C. The film also questions what role violence and a lack of hope plays in producing radicalism.

Up front, Ali seems like a personable, laid-back kind of guy. In the film’s close-ups, however, we quickly come to see fear and sadness in his eyes – and sometimes retreat, like he’s trying to shelter himself. The roots of this grew during Ali’s childhood in the ghetto surrounded by physical and psychological violence. He was a victim, and it was only when he went to Vietnam that he gained a sense of personal power. Upon returning to the US, however, he experienced the nation’s backlash against Vietnam soldiers and quickly spiraled into profound hatred of his fellow citizens and a sense of self-loathing. With frank, and sometimes chilling, candidness, Ali recounts how he planned to kill civilians or himself, but was saved by Islam just in time; how, as an African-American, he felt accepted by his new faith; the bloodlust he had while fighting wars for six years in Lebanon and Bosnia; and the experience of being shot multiple times for “the pleasure of God by taking a stand to help the ill-treated and oppressed.”

Audience members reacted with murmured comments to Ali’s stories ─ like how he stopped keeping count of the people he’d killed. One person reportedly remarked, “A**hole.” There was also recognition of Ali’s humanity among some viewers when the film showed that this trained killer was also a loving family man who wanted the best for his children.

No simple answers

Amidst the film’s many complexities, we’re challenged to question Ali’s true motivation for leaving his homeland to pick up a gun for an adopted religion. Who or what is he really fighting for – Islam or something else? Perhaps this is his best answer:

“I don’t hate Jews, I don’t hate Christians, I don’t hate Muslims. I don’t hate any person. I just hate the sick, the mad, the ill that comes out of us all – even myself. That’s what I’m at war with…even myself.”

Ali insists he’s not “an aggressor,” but rather a fighter against those who invade other’s land. Though he now lives peacefully in Bosnia-Herzegovina with his family, where there’s no ‘concrete jungle like D.C., people have a sense of discipline and where families have both a mother and father,’ he remains at the ready to fight again and die a martyr if needed.

If you were to take Ali’s desire to fight, however, and remove the jihadist element, what would you have? A man that fought in wars – not through random terrorist acts – to help a group of people. It then raises the question, “How is that any different from a Westerner fighting to protect what they believe in?” AMERICAN JIHADIST truly makes it difficult to draw the line between good and evil, us vs. them, as we so often do.

To learn more about this film and DVD availability, visit: http://www.americanjihadist.com

 

2011 Fest Photos

March 8th, 2011

Below are some of the still images from the fest.  Please check back as we plan on adding more here in the next few days.

Where Do the Fallen Go?: Director Jennilyn Merten talks about her time with the SONS OF PERDITION

March 7th, 2011

SONS OF PERDITION; dirs. Jennilyn Merten & Tyler Measom

by Brian Lepire

Jennilyn Merten was finishing up her graduate studies at the University of Utah when she caught a news program that hit close to her heart.

It was a story about teenage boys who escape from the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saint religion, a polygamist sect of the Mormon faith that has closed itself off from the rest of the world. Once they make it out of a community where movies, music and truth are censored or forbidden, they forced to survive in a world they have never known. Merten, a former Mormon herself, felt like she needed to find out more.

More than three years after dropping her studies and joining up with co-director/producer Tyler Meamson, Merten finished SONS OF PERDITION, a film that follows three of the “lost boys” as they struggle to survive on the streets. They deal with alcohol, drugs, abandonment and the search to find a home in a new land.

SFF blog editor Brian Lepire met up with Merten prior to Monday night’s screening of SONS OF PERDITION to talk about radicalism, Oprah Winfery’s new network and where the lens ends and humanity begins.


Brian Lepire: You dropped your graduate studies, you left graduate school, to go and start work on this film. What was it about these kids, the sons of perdition, that made you want to step away from the life you were living and invest so much?

Jennilyn Merten: I think the big thing was it was this recognition of a story that my partner Tyler and I had been living for so long, which was this process of losing your religion and leaving your religion and losing your faith.

It was so traumatic, this process of not deciding not to believe anymore and going out in search of something else. When we left the mainstream Mormon faith, we went through so much trauma with our families and our communities because you go from having this built-in, amazing community to having nothing. People think you are bad and you are so “messed up” that you must have done something horrible.

It’s like this rebirthing process, and over the years, we went through this process with friends. We didn’t encourage them to leave, but once you do leave, you end up finding other people that have survived.

So we went through this process, helping other friends. It’s this really traumatic, social, cultural, familial process. When we heard about the kids’ story, we thought “This is it. This is that process at large, and it’s this story that needs to be told.” And it’s not just a story about these homeless kids, but a deeper, more spiritual story about losing your faith and a universal story about what you are willing to give up to find out who you are.

It’s a search for identity that has a lot of risk and a lot of sacrifices…A lot of people leave their country or faith to survive and get a better life for themselves, and that’s what we saw these kids doing. Even though they were teenagers who didn’t exactly know what they were doing, they just felt [that life] wasn’t right. I had a lot of respect for that.

BL: What was your first impression when you met them? You had heard about them on the news and immediately felt this connection. It took a little bit to get a hold of them, but once you met them, what was your impression of who they were and where they were at at the time you met them?

JM: You could tell there was a range of feeling or experience. Some of the older boys, who had been out for a few years, could articulate themselves and they could talk to the social workers, and then the kids who had just gotten out were just quiet and terrified and just looked like scared rabbits. They just looked petrified and very defensive.

You could see them at different stages, and some of the older kids said it took about a year, year and a half, to get your feet under you. When they come out, they don’t know who the Beatles are, they don’t know who Bob Dylan is, they don’t know what any of the movies are. They are like a Tablua Rasa. They get out and have this whole background in their religion and mainstream America is this foreign land to them.

Think of it like you are dropping this person off in a foreign country. They are moving through an alien landscape, and it’s mainstream America. They hadn’t seen a documentary, they didn’t know who Brad Pitt was, they hadn’t seen “Raiders of the Lost Ark”.

BL: Alright. That’s a crime right there.

JM: I KNOW!

BL: I think we should back up a bit here. What is the difference between the mainstream Mormon church and the church this kids are being expelled from?

JM: Thank you for asking that question, because I think a lot of people conflate the fundamentalists and the mainstream church. They are very distinct communities at this point. The mainstream Mormon church gave up polygamy in 1890, and it took a few decades to completely abdicate it and get it out of their system. But by the 1930s, the polygamists were on their own, had their own prophet, were separate and anybody practicing polygamy were being excommunicated.

The mainstream Mormon church today does not practice polygamy [and] is a very sophisticated, bureaucratic American religion.

The FLDS believe the Mormon church…they call it the “Great Abominable Church.” They feel like they are the traitors because they gave away the principle of polygamy.

BL: Is that the defining difference, or are there other issues surrounding it?

JM: There are a lot of other differences, but that’s the main, defining difference. The mainstream Mormon church is part of mainstream America in all of its facets. People go to normal schools and everything is just like growing up in America. The FLDS is a hidden community. They pulled their kids out of public school. They are Millennialists who believe the end is near. They shun public education and the outside world.

Where the mainstream Mormon church works with very much with the laws and the cultural limits within America, the FLDS basically say “We are above the President. It’s God’s laws, not American laws.” So they break the laws with impunity, because they believe they are above and beyond it.

They have something called “Bleeding the Beast”, where its essentially “We are living in America and we think it is doomed, so we are going to take advantage of its’ opportunities.” So they’ll take all the welfare they can get and strain the system.

BL: This community is both completely separate from the Mormon church and stripped of modernism, of what society is today.

JM: To a point, and this is something that’s surprising. They dress in their pioneer-esque clothing and things like that, but they have I-pods. They have cell phones, and they have surveillance systems…and they have tracking systems, so they aren’t Luddites. They use technology where it is convenient for them. So they will have super-sophisticated surveillance equipment, and they have their own websites…They have I-pods.

That’s how we got the sermons of [FLDS’ leader/ “prophet”] Warren Jeff’s. We found a woman who had over a hundred sermons of his on his I-pod…That’s the only thing you are allowed to have on your I-pod, only Warren Jeff’s teachings or his sermons or his music. He actually covered Bob Dylan and the Beatles and said they were his.

BL: With the kids coming out, did you notice any trends in them? Was there anything that really stood out about them and their progression? You spent a good amount of time with them as they worked through the process and worked their way into society. What were some trends and some problems you noticed them all going through?

JM: The biggest thing for them is that they believe they are going to hell. Once you leave, you are condemned to hell and are separated from your family. You are cut off from your family, no longer allowed to have contact with them, so…not only are you separated from your family, but you are separated from them for eternity.

Basically, the kids feel like they are doomed, so they have the feeling that, “Since I’m doomed anyways, I’m going to have the most fun possible in this life.”

They get out, absorb everything they possibly can and go a little bit crazy. Their first sort-of step is they go deep down into alcoholism and drug use.

You know, you see kids party in college. These kids drink to anesthetize themselves. They drink to wipe away the pain. They go through a lot. Drugs, alcohol, crime, which is awful, because it makes them a little bit unlovable and people don’t want to help them because they seem like a burden. But really, their souls are crushed.

Can you imagine at sixteen being separated from your family and being told you are an evil person? Family is everything to those kids. So then they start to pull out a little bit and look around and think “Maybe I can make something of the rest of my life.”

They slowly begin to learn about the rest of the world and learn about other religions and begin to realize they’ve been lied to and that there is hope for them. The big turning point is when they realize that they aren’t going to hell for leaving.

BL: At this point, what role does religion play in their lives? Do they hold onto the Mormon teachings, or is it similar to the process you and your friends went through where you find yourself leaving the church? They were kicked out of their church, kicked out of their communities, but did that mean they left their faith behind, as well?

JM: The way the kids have said it to us is they still believe in God, but they are tired of religion for awhile.

They still love their families. Sam, one of the boys, said it best when he said “I had the best childhood. I wouldn’t trade it for anything…but when you grow up, you realize that you’re different.”

They have a deep appreciation for their community values: family, home, siblings, food…actually, when they first got out, that’s all they talked about. They missed the food. They missed the home cooking. I wish I could’ve put more of that in the film…It’s really adorable.

BL: You ended up over the weekend mentioning that you ended up taking a big step into the movie itself helping a young woman escape, someone who had escape numerous times before. Does that make it into the film at all?

JM: It does a little bit. There’s a couple of escape attempts we do get involved in, and you see those in the film. There were three more. I think there was a total of six escape attempts this young woman made. So you do see that in the film, and you do see us involved, which is why you hear the questions at screenings “You guys are driving the getaway vehicle?”

It happens so spontaneous. We had gone out there a couple of time to help the kids try to see their parents and, one time, we went out to help one of the kids contact his mom and the little sister runs out with a garbage bag of clothes, and we had no idea that was going to happen.

What do you do? We know she’s trying to escape, and they are yelling at us “GO! GO! GO!” We aren’t going to say “Go back in with your garbage bag,” because if they see you go back in, they are going to kick the s**t out of you.

BL: As a filmmaker, do you have any qualms about that, in hindsight?

JM: Actually, I feel like we did the right thing. I feel like we tried to be objective, but then, I also think when you are involved in a story like that you have a responsibility to the story you’re involved in.

I think people just want to approach story telling from an academic perspective and say “Never affect the story.”…I don’t believe objectivity exists. I believe you can be fair, and truthful, but I think objectivity is an academic concept that already changes by the time you’ve made a relationship with somebody. I feel it’s more important to honor those relationships and the fidelity of that interaction…My partner always says “You are a human first and a filmmaker second.”

BL: I guess that’s the question: “What would you do in that situation?”

JM: Right. These kids depended on us. When I’m in the next situation, I’ll handle that differently. When the law failed, we felt like we could break the law.

BL: I’m going to jump off track and talk about the business side of film-making. The film just got picked up by Oprah Winfrey’s television network, OWN. How does that make you feel as a filmmaker, a documentarian who has gone around to all the different film festival trying to get the money, trying to get the funding back?

JM: It’s amazing! We feel really lucky that for our first doc we have the support of Oprah and her new doc club. We are not only happy that she involved us, but that she is doing this and taking documentaries seriously, so it’s really nice.

But there’s still a lot of work to do. We do a lot of work on our own. We are doing our own theatrical. We are working with somebody else for international. No one loves your film like you, and you have to be willing to get out there and work.

BL: Are there any parting thoughts you would like audience to think of when they go to the theater to see SONS OF PERDITION?

JM: Just that I hope the bigger context of the movie comes across. That this is a coming of age story, and that they see themselves a little bit in it…I hope they walk away with something a bit more personal.


SONS OF PERDITION screened Monday, March 7 at Cinema Salem to a sold-out audience. Merten was in attendance.

2011 Salem Film Fest expands venues

March 6th, 2011

by Sarah Wolfe

Salem Film Fest-goers can attend screenings in not one, not two, but three different venues this year. In addition to Cinema Salem, the Peabody Essex Museum and National Park Service Visitor Center are on board to show selected works.

The idea of expanding screening sites “beyond the four walls of Cinema Salem” was heavily considered before last year’s festival, says Paul Van Ness, SFF founder and Cinema Salem owner. There were concerns about whether having more venues would diminish the communal spirit of watching the same films together and being able to strike up conversations on the experience afterwards, often with strangers. Last year’s first-time screening at PEM, however, proved the opposite: it enhanced that special dynamic.

“It was a natural step to expand a bit more this year,” says Van Ness. “I think the heart of the festival will always be the movie theater, but as we add other venues, there’s a potential for building even more community involvement on top of the amazing level that’s already offered. As an all-volunteer fest, the strength of the festival has always been the personal commitment, enthusiasm, and even joy of the organizers, sponsors and audiences. Adding more screenings around the city offers the opportunity for many more people to get involved.”

 

Making the cut

Given there are 31 films this year, you might wonder how PEM and the Visitor Center made their picks. Van Ness credits the eclectic selection – ranging from movies about young musicians and senior Olympians to social injustice fighters and couples in love.

PEM received five films, chosen by Joe Cultrera, Festival Programming Director, and narrowed it down to three that each tied into the museum’s collections.

“BILL CUNNINGHAM NEW YORK is a film about fashion as traced by Bill Cunningham for the NEW YORK TIMES Sunday Styles section and has a cameo with Iris Apfel. PEM recently had an exhibition of fashion icon Iris Apfel,” says Mary Beth Bainbridge, a SFF volunteer and PEM’s Assistant to the Chief Curator.

THE WOODMANS, a portrait of late photographer Francesca Woodman, told through her work and interviews with artists/parents Betty and Charles, resonates with PEM’s vast collection of photographs, Bainbridge adds, and PINK SARIS, the story of a strong woman in India working to empower others, fits with an entire gallery at the museum devoted to modern and contemporary Indian art.

On top of the tie-ins with the museum’s art exhibits, Bainbridge points out that several PEM staff members have played active roles in past Salem Film Fests including: Jennifer Evans, Manager of Adult Programs; Michelle Moon, Assistant Director of Adult Programs Education; and Trevor Smith, Curator of the museum’s Contemporary Art.

For the Visitor Center, GROWN IN DETROIT – about urban farming – connected strongly to its mission and activities.

“In the past we’ve been involved with First Bloom with the National Parks Foundation, which encourages inner-city youth to get out and enjoy nature,” says Emily Murphy, Public Information Officer. “We partnered with the Boys and Girls Club of Salem and they replanted the garden behind Derby House.”

In addition to seeing films at PEM and the Visitor Center, viewers can get a “two-for-one-deal”: an opportunity to explore these local institutions before or after the screenings. “SFF will introduce some of the treasures of Salem to people who might not otherwise discover them,” Van Ness explains.

 

Expansion ahead

As for future venues, Van Ness says several locations show promise, including the theater at Salem State University and the old St. Mary’s Italian Church if the Salem Community Arts Center comes to fruition.

Beyond the expansion of screening venues, the festival’s discussions, seminars, musical performances and soirees also have the potential for even further community involvement.

“We look forward to finding creative ways to get more and more venues, including restaurants, theaters and hotels, involved in the future,” says Van Ness.

 

Not a Black & White Film: Interview with PLAY IN THE GRAY’s Kaitlin Meelia

March 6th, 2011

by Brian Lepire

PLAY IN THE GRAY; dir. Kaitlin Meelia

PLAY IN THE GRAY follows Boston-based drag and cabaret troupe “All the King’s Men” out of the stage’s spotlight and into the dark crevices of the member’s subconscious, where gender roles are questioned and identities are discovered.

Director Kaitlin Meelia spent time with the troupe, filming them as they performed as women dressed as men or looking like men dressed as women. She also brought her camera to the members’ hometowns and into conversations with their families about who they are and who they want to become. Meelia answered some questions for SFF blog editor Brian Lepire about her experiences as a first-time director, seeing ATKM live and how audiences have reacted to PLAY IN THE GRAY.

 

Brian Lepire: How did you first come across “All the King’s Men”?

Kaitlin Meelia: I first came across All the King’s Men at one of their performances in Boston.  I was blown away by their show. Specifically, I loved how they brought such huge questions about gender and sexuality to the stage and made them accessible to their audience.

BL: What about the troupe made you want to tell their story?

KM: After seeing the troupe for the first time, I began talking with them about the possibility of producing a documentary on how they deal with gender in their art and in their lives. I knew that they had an interesting story to tell on stage. As I began to get to know the troupe, I discovered that each member also had an interesting story to tell off the stage about gender, sexuality, and coming of age.

BL: This was your first time directing a feature-length documentary. What were some of your concerns when you took on the project?

KM: As a first time director, I had many concerns going into this project. One of my main concerns was raising enough money to finish the film. Aside from that, I was learning a lot as I went through the process of directing the film. At first, I was concerned that this may hold us back or slow us down. However, I was lucky enough to have a very talented and experienced team working with me throughout the production.

BL: What lessons did you take away from this film, both as a young director and as an observer?

KM: I took many lessons away from the production of PLAY IN THE GRAY. From the prospective of a story-teller, I learned how important it is to develop a close relationship with your documentary subject. We took a lot of time to get to know the members of ATKM and in the end, I believe it really paid off. As an observer of ATKM and the messages in the film, I gained a deeper understanding and appreciation for self-expression and living outside of cultural boundaries and social expectations.

BL: As the title of the film suggests, All the King’s Men work to blur the gender line. Having brought your documentary across the country, what has been audience reactions to ATKM and PLAY IN THE GRAY? What does seeing the members’ back stories and personal struggles with gender roles add to the message of ATKM’s stage show?

KM: PLAY IN THE GRAY has been very well received by audiences across the US and abroad. I particularly love screening for youth and young adults who are struggling with issues around sexual orientation and gender identity. I believe that by getting a glimpse into the personal lives of ATKM, these kids are able to feel less alone and possibly become inspired to live their truth.

PLAY IN THE GRAY premieres at the Salem Film Fest Monday, March 7 at 8:15 p.m. in the main theater at Cinema Salem. Members of “All the King’s Men” will be in attendance to take questions from the audience after the screening.

Saturday: Packed House!

March 6th, 2011

Photo by Perry Hallinan

The lobby of Cinema Salem was packed Saturday afternoon as film fans arrived from all over for the festival.

Both the 5 pm showing of A GOOD DAY TO DIE and the 7:30 screening of LOUDER THAN A BOMB sold out prior to showtime. The main theater of Cinema Salem holds 154 people, and both films were at full capacity for the viewing, as well as question and answer sessions with people directly linked to the films afterwards. Co-directors Lynn Salt and Davide Mueller were on hand to discuss A GOOD DAY TO DIE, as wells as the subjects of LOUDER THAN A BOMB, who did an impromptu poetry slam following the movie.

With outstanding documentaries like AMERICAN JIHADIST, CON ARTIST and LOVE ETC. planned for Sunday afternoon, fans should plan to be here early to insure getting a ticket.

 

Off the Celluloid: Live Entertainment at the Salem Film Fest

March 5th, 2011

All the amusement isn’t just up on the screen at the Salem Film Fest.

Local musician and performance artists will take the stage prior to several of the films this year for audience enjoyment. It is a call-back to a time when a live organ sat on stage at the precursor to Cinema Salem, Salem’s Paramount Theatre.

Most performances begin a half-an-hour before showtime, so be sure to come early and see the live show.

Saturday, March 5

7:05 pm – Pens Perforum

Sunday, March 6

1:45 pm – Mike Comite

7 pm – Black Dog Brothers & Friends

Monday, March 7

7:50 pm – Honour Hero Havoc

Tuesday, March 8

6:05 pm – Salem Philharmonic Chamber Players

Wednesday, March 9

7:30 pm – Portia S. Walker

Thursday, March 10

6:05 pm – Chris Dowgin

7:40 pm – The Legion of Clowns