FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Erik Ljung, Director of THE BLOOD IS AT THE DOORSTEP

Erik Ljung is a freelance Producer and Director of Photography currently based in the midwest. He has produced content and short documentaries for the New York Times, VICE News, Al Jazeera, PBS and the Wall Street Journal.

Salem Film Fest program director Jeff Schmidt caught up Ljung ahead of THE BLOOD IS AT THE DOORSTEP's New England premiere on Friday, March 23 at 6:45 at CinemaSalem.

JS: How did you get into filmmaking?

EL: I think making videos has been apart of my life since I was about 10 years old, but I never thought a career in a creative field was a legitimate career option for me. I didn’t really start working as a filmmaker until I was in my late 20’s. Back in 2010 I took a week off of work to help some friends make a documentary that took me from Milwaukee to Boston and back. We basically just followed a local band on tour (the film ended up being very little about the band), but after that week I was hooked and knew I had to work “in the field” and not behind a desk. When I returned to work, I promptly quit without much of a plan, but I cut my teeth assisting stills photographers and shooting weddings, which eventually morphed into smaller one man band video work and went from there. My primary source of income now is from freelance DP work, mainly in video journalism and documentary work, as well as some ad agency work. I’ve found that having a hire-able skill has helped sustained creating independent projects such as THE BLOOD IS AT THE DOORSTEP. Working freelance can also get in the way of trying to make that film, but finding a balance between paying the bills and getting your project done is key.

JS: When did you become aware of the Dontre Hamilton shooting and at what point did you decide to film?

EL: I found out about the shooting the day it happened, when Dontre’s name had not even been mentioned yet. I live just a mile from the park where he was killed, and that park is literally right across the street from the job that I quit that I previously mentioned. It is the most central park in downtown Milwaukee, and it was the middle of the business day. Dontre was shot 14 times by an officer responding to a non-emergency wellness check of someone sleeping in the park. It didn’t make sense, and the number of shots was hard for people to comprehend. The day after the shooting, Dontre was labeled as a violent, mentally ill homeless person, etc. I grew up with a cousin who developed paranoid schizophrenia and is literally homeless in my hometown of Sonoma, CA. So Dontre’s story hit close to me, and the way the Chief immediately scapegoated mental illness only added to the stigma of mental illness and the families that struggle to support their loved ones struggling. Those first couple days, I knew I would do something, but wasn’t sure what.

JS: As you watch the film, it's really impressive the amount of access you gained and searched out in trying to tell the different sides of the story. How did you approach the family of Dontre Hamilton and Milwaukee Police chief Ed Flynn to participate in the film?

EL: I wanted to get involved earlier, but I had a lot of doubts about approaching the family. I had to really question myself if I was the right person to tell this story, if I could even handle the responsibility, if I would be able to see it through, and why did I want to do this story. It is extremely intimidating to approach a family going through a tragedy like this and try to explain why a documentary should be made, so you really have to question yourself if it should and if you should be the one telling it. I finally approached the family once they put themselves out in the public at their first rally at Red Arrow Park. I was introduced through mutual acquaintances, and it really began with just filming the family at rallies until we both grew comfortable with each other.

Getting access to the police department proved to be difficult because I was not affiliated with any news agency, and so I think they saw me more as being an activist than a documentary filmmaker. I did not have a lot of connections in the independent film world, so I ended up pitching portions of the story to news outlets in order to get funding to keep working on the film. It wasn’t until I started covering the case for The New York Times and Al Jazeera that the police department started to open their doors a little bit.

JS: What has the reaction to the film been by the participants?

EL: The family has been very supportive of the film. I think it is still difficult for them to watch at times, but they sit through every screening and always catch something different. The family has attended quite a bit of screenings and we have been trying to set up more community and educational screenings with them in order to connect with audiences on issues of police violence and mental health, and ways to be involved.

We screened the film at the Milwaukee Film Festival back in October, and recently held a screening for Milwaukee politicians, but Chief Flynn, nor the District Attorney or Police Union President has accepted our invitations yet. Police Chief Flynn went into early retirement in February.

JS: Your story is highly charged with emotions on all sides, as a filmmaker can you talk about your process in filming in these circumstances?

EL: In a lot of ways I was an outsider. In particular, there is a scene where a group of Milwaukee mothers who have lost sons to police violence meet in order to be supportive to one another as they fight together and individually in their sons cases. I was the only one who was not a parent in the room, the only man, and the only white person in the room. I primarily worked as a one man band in the field. Part of this was due to budgetary constraints, but more importantly  it was in order to maintain the intimacy of these situations and environments. I didn’t want people to feel like they were on a reality television show, I wanted to be as invisible as possible. I kept my mouth shut and tried to stay out of the way. They were letting me into their lives in a way that showed them at their most vulnerable, and I was fully aware of how personal these moments were. I did not deserve to be there, but the Hamilton family trusted me and were eager to have the full story out there about who Dontre was and who there family was.

JS: What role do you think documentary film can play in creating change?EL: This is the golden question and always the hardest thing to quantify. With a film like this I hope to challenge people’s assumptions, no matter what their perspective. But, how do we translate this film into real tangible action or change? I don’t want people to walk out of the theater and think of it as just a movie, or something that happened far away to someone else. The blood is on everybody’s doorstep, and it is going to take everyone to chip in and make the changes that they want to see, whether that is issues related to police violence, gun violence, or the environment. It is important to keep people informed and share information online and on social media, but it is going to take more than that. It is going to take figuring out what you are concerned about, what your skillset is, and how you can contribute. It is going to take getting out into the community. It is going to take voting in ALL of your local elections. Local elections always have very low turnouts, but are the elections that will most likely directly affect you the most.

FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Marc de Guerre, Director of BEAUTY AND RUIN

Marc de Guerre is a documentary writer and director who lives and works in Toronto, Canada. He has been making films since 2000. His films are reflective of his broad interests in the areas of popular culture, art; sexuality, and science and technology. From the murder of John Lennon, to Christian rock musicians in Nashville; from love-doll devotees in Tokyo to professional computer gamers in Seoul and the multibillion dollar ‘crisis management’ industry in LA, Washington and NY.

De Guerre's latest film, BEAUTY AND RUIN examines Detroit as it faces bankruptcy, and all assets are on the table, including the Detroit Institute of Art’s priceless collection. A struggle unfolds between the retired city workers, who want the art sold to fund their pensions and health care, and the museum, which wants to preserve the city’s cultural treasure for future generations.Salem Film Fest selection committee member Shelley Sackett caught up with de Guerre ahead of his film's East Coast premiere at the Peabody Essex Museum on Saturday, March 24 at 8:10pm.

SS: How did you get into filmmaking?

MdG: I kind of ambled my way into filmmaking. I was a painter and visual artist for a long time with a day job doing archival research for documentaries. Eventually, I just kind of fell in love with the medium and decided I'd rather be making films!

SS: How did you get involved with this project?

MdG: This project was really a labor of love project, initiated by myself. I worked on it for close to a year before I had a producer and any financing. It's a film I felt really compelled to make.

SS:Why did you feel compelled to make this film? What about the story ignited the fire in your belly?

MdG: I think it's partly growing up in Toronto. Detroit is the closest large American city by a long way (Chicago would be 2nd--but it's much further), so you kind of grow up with this awareness of this mythical American place, which is also accessible — it's just a straight shot down the highway from Toronto.The thing that really drew me to the story though, was the realization that the DIA is just this fantastically important museum totally landlocked in this city that seemed to be on a permanent downward spiral. The juxtaposition of the phenomenal beauty of the collection set against the ruin of the surrounding city just really called out to me as a filmmaker.

SS:What have been the reactions to the film by audiences?

MdG: In general, it’s been very positive overall — although as you can imagine there has been quite a bit of discussion surrounding the essentially unresolveable and intractable nature of Detroit's economic problems. Overall people are massively disposed to really feeling for the plight of the retirees.  Also, the backstory of the American acquisition of old master paintings and the rise of the American art museum seems to have really intrigued people.

SS: What do you hope audiences take away from the film?

MdG:I suppose I'd like them to think that the film is balanced in its presentation of the issues. It's such a complex and somewhat painful situation that is being depicted, and I’d like to think they would end up seeing the validity of both sides of the dilemma.

SS:Have you screened the film in a museum before? Do you think there is any irony in screening it at PEM?

MdG: It actually showed in Singapore at an art museum there! I’m really thrilled that it is screening at the art museum in Salem. I think the natural constituency for the doc is a museum going audience, so we'd love to have it shown in as many museums as possible!

SS:Has there been any reaction in Detroit?

MdG: Everyone who has seen it down there has been very supportive. I think that they find that the complexity of the issue was adequately and fairly represented. Also, on some level I think they are just happy that the story of the DIA and the bankruptcy was captured for posterity. It was a very important moment for them...

SS: What are you looking forward to at SFF?MdG:I am mainly looking forward to meeting other filmmakers and everyone from the festival, but I am also very excited to have the film screening at a historic venue like the PEM. I hope to be able to take a few hours to explore the collection!

SS:What is your next project?

MdG:I’m working on a few things, including a documentary about the son of the great painter Balthus. He is one of the great bon vivants of the 20th century, and we've been shooting together over the last few months.

FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Lindsey Grayzel, Director of THE RELUCTANT RADICAL

If a crime is committed in order to prevent a greater crime, is it forgivable? Is it, in fact, necessary? THE RELUCTANT RADICAL explores these questions by following activist Ken Ward as he confronts his fears and puts himself in the direct path of the fossil fuel industry to combat climate change. Ken breaks the law as a last resort, to fulfill what he sees as his personal obligation to future generations.

Salem Film Fest Selection Committee member Shelley Sackett caught up with director Lindsey Grayzel ahead of the East Coast Premiere of THE RELUCTANT RADICAL, which will take place at 7:20pm on Sunday, March 25 at CinemaSalem.

SS: How did you get involved with this project?

LG: I met Ken in the summer of 2015 and found him to be a fascinating person who made me feel differently about climate change after our first conversation. I found his personal history compelling as he worked for over 20 years as a leader within environmental organizations and then transformed his approach to civil disobedience direct action as he realized that traditional lobbying was ineffective and far too little, too late to bring about the changes needed to avert catastrophe. When I asked him if he would agree to me making a film he readily agreed, because it was one approach he hadn’t yet tried.

SS: I understand Ken Ward's life has a Massachusetts connection?

LG: Ken lived in Massachusetts on and off for almost 30 years. He lived in Amherst from 1975-1981, in Boston from 2000-2003 and in Boston and Hull from 2006-2013.

SS: What do you hope audiences take away from the film?

LG: Ken speaks about climate change bluntly and honestly, in a way that almost everyone body else works hard to avoid doing. In fact, most of us work hard to avoid thinking about the devastation that is unfolding because it’s psychologically uncomfortable. Ken pays a price for facing it head on, and it’s his personal journey and commitment to act that I hope will challenge the audience to inspect the ways in which we are in denial about this crisis. We are not powerless to change the course ahead, yet we downplay the urgency of climate change in order to avoid our fears. I hope that audiences realize that we do indeed have power to slow down and prevent the worst case scenarios of climate change and commit themselves to joining the fight for our future.

SS: What are you looking forward to at SFF?LG: I’m most looking forward to hearing how the audience reacts to the film. So far we have had only had two public screenings, and so it still thrills me to hear a group collectively giggle or sigh during certain scenes. I’m looking forward to the Q&A because I’m curious what kinds of questions and issues the film brings up for people, and if my themes came across clearly. I’m also looking forward to connecting with other filmmakers and seeing some great films!

SS: Anything else you'd like to add?

LG: On October 11, 2016, my cameraman Carl Davis and myself were filming Ken undertake a big direct action to shut down the TransMountain tar sands oil pipeline. Ken waited for the police to arrive and we were filming to capture the scene of his arrest. To our surprise, the police then arrested us for filming and charged us with the same three felonies and misdemeanor as Ken was charged with, though we had broken no laws.

The same day my soon to be co-producer Deia Schlosberg was filming Michael Foster as he shut down the Keystone XL tar sands oil pipeline in North Dakota. She was also arrested and charged with felonies simply for filming. Our arrests contributed to the alarm that press freedom and First Amendment rights have increasingly come under attack as law enforcement and prosecutors favor corporate fossil fuel interests over citizens’ rights.  All of our charges were eventually dropped, but not before we spent time in jail, posted bail, hired lawyers to file briefs, and fought for the return of our confiscated equipment and footage.

To this day Deia has been unable to get her footage returned to her. We feel that the police and prosecutors were attempting to squelch our work and intimidate filmmakers from getting these stories told. I’m happy to say that their tactics backfired, as Deia and I then began to work together and both of us are more determined than ever to make sure these stories are told.

FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Bing Liu, Director of MINDING THE GAP

MINDING THE GAP is the directorial debut for Bing Liu, who will be attending both the Salem Film Fest opening night screening at CinemaSalem on Thursday, March 22 at 8pm, as well as a special encore screening at Endicott College's Walter J. Manninen Center for the Arts, Rose Performance Hall on Saturday, March 24 at 4:30pm.  Liu's film was awarded the jury award for breakthrough filmmaking in the U.S. Documentary Competition category at this year's Sundance Film Festival.

Salem Film Fest program director Jeff Schmidt caught up with Liu to discuss his film:

JS: How did you become interested in filmmaking?

BL: I broke my arm when I was 14 and started filming skateboarding as a way to keep hanging out with my buddies while I was convalescing. Eventually I fell in love with filming--like skateboarding, it gave me a feeling of control and a way to interact with others and step outside of my shy shell. I think it was when I saw Richard Linklater's film WAKING LIFE that I realized I wanted to take my love for shooting and editing skate videos and translate it into other forms of media. That film really blew me away--to this day I think it's the film I've seen more than any other.

JS: MINDING THE GAP's roots begin with the early skateboarding videos we see early on in the film - when did you realize that you had a deeper story that you wanted to tell?

BL: After graduating with an English degree, I set out on a year-long couch-surfing mission across the country to try to understand my upbringing by interviewing other skateboarders. I discovered a pattern of family disfunction that felt oddly familiar. A couple years later, I assembled all my footage and brought the project through Kartemquin's Diverse Voices in Documentary fellowship.

Over the next six months, Kartemquin introduced me to cinema verite, to films like HOOP DREAMS, to character-driven documentary storytelling. Somewhere along the way the name MINDING THE GAP was born, I wrote my first log line, and I made a demo video to pitch the project to funders. After the fellowship, Kartemquin brought me on as a co-production. I continued traveling around the country following up with the skateboarders I'd initially interviewed, but kept returning to my hometown of Rockford, Illinois. I think it was my executive producer Gordon Quinn who encouraged me to keep following a teenager I felt an indescribable connection to: Keire Johnson. We bonded quickly and then when I found out our mutual friend Zack was about to be a father, I started following him too. Eventually all the other subjects tapered off as I dug deeper into Zack and Keire's lives. Even from the get go, everyone I was filming knew that I was making a documentary about skateboarders' relationships with their fathers, which was the logline I'd put up on our website and Facebook page. So a lot of the time it felt like just waiting around for the roman candle fights and skate sessions to end, so I could ask them about why they didn't get along with their dads (laughs).

Over the years of making the film, I actually had to learn to pull back on the issues and lean in to those seemingly mundane moments. So I guess I started off wanting to make a deep issue film but learned that what actually engages people is a story. The structuring of the film in which audiences get to experience me coming into my own as a filmmaker was kind of an accident--I don't think my co-editor Josh Altman or I really realized that'd be a takeaway. We thought of it more like an interesting way of setting up my relationship with Zack and Keire.

JS: The main characters of your film, also happen to be friends that you grew up with - that must have been both helpful and challenging at times. What was that like?

BL: It was helpful in that they put 100% confidence in me and gave me permission to access the deepest parts of them. The trust was already established--and trust and access are the main ingredients of documentary storytelling. But there's this idea of loyalty with friends, and I think that was tested during the making of the film. This isn't the first time this has happened in a documentary, but I feel like we dealt with it in Minding the Gap in a way that was both fair and transparent about how difficult it was for all of us.

JS: There are some really great skateboarding shots in your film that required you to skate and film at the same time, how long did it take you to perfect this unique skill set?

BL: Actually the one time I was on the board was when I was bombing the parking garage and doing that long intro shot. Most of the time I was running on foot. I used a 5D and a Canon 16-35mm lens mounted to a Glidecam, which is like a poor man's Steadicam. I picked up tips and tricks from Steadicam operators I assisted for, so I got the hang of it pretty quickly but it wasn't until about a year in that I felt like I'd become completely fluent in the tool. Like fluent to the point of being intuitive If that makes sense. And a lot of it was learned from just being a skateboarder and knowing how they move, too, which is more like dancing than anything else. And my Glidecam technique allowed me to dance along with them.

JS: You picked up an award at Sundance for MINDING THE GAP, what has the reaction been from your friends and family that appear in the film?

BL: We showed everyone the film before we picture locked--it's something we believe is the ethical thing to do at Kartemquin and they do it for all their films. I sat down with everyone separately and watched with them, secretly trying not to let them know that I was micro-analyzing their body language and facial expressions. Keire's reaction was sort of like mirroring his emotions on screen but in real-time, it was kind of classic Keire (laughs). Watching with Zack was hard for both of us. But when the credits rolled I looked over at Zack and he was overwhelmed with emotion and we talked for hours about everything with the same sort of emotional openness he had in the interview by the river that's in the film. It was a sobering moment for him I think. But he told me he appreciated the honesty of the film and how I'd put myself in it as well. For Nina it was frustrating because it was sort of like re-living memories she thought she had moved on from. My co-producer Diane and I, along with a Kartemquin consulting producer, Maggie Bowman, sat with Nina for a while and listened to Nina process all her thoughts. In the end, Nina also told me she appreciated that I told both sides of the story. I sent my mom and brother links, I don't think I was able to bring myself to watch with them. They both told me they're just proud of me.

In terms of winning the award, I don't think it really registered on them. In the end, even high-profile film festivals can still be a distant and insular bubble for people who aren't involved in that world. I'm excited now that we have some smaller fests coming up. I'm so grateful that Sundance believed in the film enough to have us there, but I think it was a little overwhelming for the cast. With some of the more intimate screenings, I think it'll be a way for them to see how much people connect to them and their stories. I hope they can feel like their participation has made a difference.

JS: What do you hope audiences will take away from your film?

BL: At Sundance I was thrilled that everyone walked away with their own takeaways, it communicated to us that we'd made a film that was both complex and emotional; some people really connected to one aspect or one character while others appreciated a specific issue--many because of similar personal experiences. One thing I've been thinking about lately is how our society's mission of ending violence in the home is at odds with how much we value privacy. I think that's a thing that the film grapples with, too. I hope that we can start thinking about how these issues are not only emotionally difficult to talk about but can be ethically paradoxical as well. But at this point I'm just glad that audiences walk away feeling like they need to talk about it to process it.

Salem Film Fest announces PEM programming slate at SFF 2018

 Salem Film Fest has begun to unveil its programming slate for SFF 2018, revealing nine feature-length documentaries, a shorts program and the Doc-a-chusetts Pitch event - all take place at the Peabody Essex Museum (PEM), Friday March 23 - Sunday March 25. 

Friday, March 23

4pm - SHORTS BLOCK 1|
A collection of short documentaries from around the world. 

6pm - THE NEXT GUARDIAN
Directed by Arun Bhattarai and Dorottya Zurbó
The contrasting dreams of two generations clash within an ancient Buddhist monastery in Bhutan. 

8:10pm - MR. FISH: CARTOONING FROM THE DEEP END
Directed by Pablo Bryant
An outrageous editorial cartoonist tries to raise a family and maintain his defiant voice when dangerous humor has no market. 

Saturday, March 24

10am - THE DOC-A-CHUSETTS PITCH
Local filmmakers pitch their upcoming documentaries to a panel of industry members in a competition before a live audience, in which you have a vote. The winner receives a $5,000 prize package from Modulus Studios. Free Admission. 

12:15pm - American Experience presents INTO THE AMAZON
Directed by John Maggio
The remarkable story of the 1913 expedition by President Theodore Roosevelt and legendary Brazilian explorer Cândido Rondon into the heart of the South American rainforest. 

3:15pm - WAITING FOR THE SUN
Directed by Kaspar Astrup Schröder
The children of China's death row inmates long for their imprisoned parents. 

5:35pm - THE EXPERIMENTAL CITY
Directed by Chad Freidrichs
A visionary scientist, alarmed by the growing environmental crisis in 1960s America, dreams up a futuristic metropolis.

8:10pm - BEAUTY AND RUIN
Directed by Marc de Guerre
Does art matter to a city on the verge of extinction? With Detroit in bankruptcy, masterworks from the Detroit Institute of Art are in peril. 

Sunday, March 25

11:30am - RAMEN HEADS
Directed by Koki Shigeno
Chef Osamu Tomita takes cameras into his kitchen, where he shares recipes, trade secrets and his thoughts on flavors. 

2pm - A SUITABLE GIRL
Directed by Sarita Khurana and Smriti Mundhra
Three young women strive to reconcile their “new India” contemporary values, identities and dreams with their ancient tradition of arranged marriages. 

4:50pm - THE JUDGE
Directed by Erika Cohn
The first woman judge to sit on a West Bank Palestinian Shari’a court redefines how the law treats women. 

Tickets for films screening at PEM are now available at the Peabody Essex Museum box office and online or at http://salemfilmfest.com/2018/all-films-events/films/

In addition to events scheduled at PEM, festival screenings will also take place at CinemaSalem and the National Park Service Visitor Center in Salem, as well as The Cabot and Endicott College in Beverly.

More announcements and a full schedule of films will be released in the upcoming weeks - visit www.salemfilmfest.com for more information.