FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Dave O'Leske, Director of DIRTBAG

Dave O'Leske, the director of DIRTBAG: The Legend of Fred Beckey, has a degree in Biology and was on the road to medical school when he changed direction and followed his desire to explore the world and document what he had experienced through still photography and eventually video.  He started his company Through a Child’s Eyes Productions in 1998.

O'Leske has directed two other feature length documentaries, SPIRIT OF SNOW and CINEMA VERTICAL.  His work has taken him around the world filming for non-profits as well as commercial projects.  He feels strongly that filmmaking is a powerful medium which can inspire people to make positive strides in our world.

Salem Film fest program director Jeff Schmidt caught up with O'Leske prior to the SFF screening of DIRTBAG, which will take place at CinemaSalem on Monday, March 26 at 8pm:

JS: How did you meet Fred Beckey and what was your first impression of him?

DO: I was introduced to Fred through a friend, Dick Barrymore, who I had worked with on another project.  Dick gave me Fred’s address and I wrote Fred a letter pitching him on the idea of a documentary about his life.  Amazingly, he got back to me and we planned to meet in Salt Lake City where he was skiing.  I actually saw Fred at Alta Ski Area getting ready to ski and went up to introduce myself and he basically told me to get lost and that he was busy and he’d call me later.  I left with my tail between my legs, feeling like all the stories about Fred being a jerk were true.  Over a dozen phone messages later that weekend as I was packing up my car to drive home Fred called me back and said, “let’s get a cup of coffee”.  We met at a diner and I pitched him on the film idea and his first response was “why would anyone want to watch that!”  I was immediately intrigued.  That was in 2005.  For the entire next year I would meet up with Fred to climb, road trip and hang out.  We never discussed the film and I never brought out a camera.  That year of getting to know Fred, becoming friends and climbing partners and having him trust me launched the project as we headed to China together in 2006 to attempt an unclimbed 19,000’ peak he had his eye on for years.

JS: Did it take much prodding to convince Fred you should make a film together?  How long did it take to complete your film? 

DO: Fred was incredibly humble and didn’t want to be in the spotlight so that definitely made things tricky in regards to convincing him of the importance of telling his story. Fred was a very difficult subject because he never wanted a camera pointed at him and he could not understand why I would film anything but him climbing.  I don’t know how many times I would hear Fred say, “don’t point the camera at me” or “don’t waste your film”.   All of us who filmed Fred over the years would have to be really stealthy to get shots.  We would often set a camera off to the side if he was talking and hope he was in frame and in focus because if he knew we were filming him he would shut down.  As time went on he slowly, starting letting me look at his archives which were amazing and became an important part of the film.  It must have been 5 or 6 years into the project when he told me he had a box of journals he’d written starting at age 5.  We felt like we struck gold.  Things like that happened over and over all the way into when we were editing the film. We’d find some amazing new piece to the puzzle and have to figure out how to squeeze it in.  The entire project was 12 years from the initial pitch to the premiere last year.

JS: In the film, we hear from many people that Fred was a challenge to climb with, how was he to film with?

DO: Fred didn’t like to be filmed so we just had to be very respectful of how he was feeling and over a 10 year period from age 83 to 93 Fred’s ability to do what he wanted to became really limited by the aging process.  Fred would get really frustrated at times and those are some of the most powerful moments in the film when he has to struggle with the reality that he physically can’t do what he mentally believes he can.  The aging component to the film provided an important theme which transformed the movie from a climbing film to a film that everyone can relate to in some manner.  We all have to deal with aging.

JS: Are there any stories that didn't make it into the film that you can share?

DO: You know we were dealing with someone’s life that lasted 94 years so it is really difficult to narrow that amount of time down to 96 minutes in this case.  So, many components could not be included in the final film.  All of us who worked on the post production struggled with that daily on what had to be cut. That is the nature of filmmaking or story telling you have to do your best to pick the pieces that you feel tell the most compelling story.  For instance, I traveled with Fred to China a second time in 2013 when he was 90 years old.  I spent over a month with him filming and ultimately we determined it didn’t work in the final cut for varies reasons.  We are working to incorporate a lot of that type of material as extra features in the DVD version.

JS: The theme of our festival this year is "focus," that seems like Fred's most defining trait, right? 

DO: I strongly believe that Fred Beckey would have been successful at whatever he choose to do in life because of his extraordinary ability to focus.  If he would have put the same determination and focus into business, music, mathematics, art or any discipline he would have risen to the top of his field and we still would have known the name Fred Beckey.  For whatever reason, the mountains are what inspired him the most.

JS: Fred was climbing all the way into his 90s, how did he do it?  And was it a challenge for you to film?  Did you have experience climbing before the film?

DO: Fred was one of the toughest people I can imagine.  We filmed the last scenes of the film with Fred climbing in Squamish, BC.  At that time, Fred could only walk about 10 feet before having to sit down to rest but he was so determined to climb that he literally crawled to the base of the cliffs.  It was very difficult to witness but inspiring at the same time.  He ended up climbing a handful of routes at age 93 that weekend that anyone would find incredible.  Over the years, we came up with a system of how many people we would need to film and climb with Fred.  We would keep it to the bare minimum and had everything really dialed in so it was safe, fun and not overwhelming to Fred.  It was always a highlight to get Fred out climbing and there was a core group of climbers who helped Fred get outside and climb until the end.  I have been climbing for over 25 years and it was my main passion for many years.  I was able to travel and climb all over the world in China, Nepal, Pakistan, Peru, Europe and North America.  Unlike Fred, my climbing has slowed down and I don’t get out as much as I’d like to but I love being deep in the mountains with a close friend and no one else around.  It doesn’t get much better than that.  Fred was definitely onto something!

JS: Unfortunately, Fred passed away last year, but he did get to see the completed film and attend some screenings, right?  What did he think of the film?

DO: Fred passed away on Oct. 30, 2017 and the film premiered over Memorial Day weekend 2017 at Telluride Mountainfilm.  We were so honored to have Fred at the premiere!  By that time I had seen the film hundreds of times throughout the edit so I just sat and watched Fred watch the film.  He was mesmerized by it, leaning forward the entire time watching his life unfold on screen before him.  It was a very proud moment for all of us who had worked so hard on the film for so long.  He pulled me aside afterwards and told me we did a great job!  We purposefully didn’t show any cut of the film to Fred before that because we knew he wouldn’t show up at the premiere if he’d seen it all ready and we really wanted him to feel the energy and love of the audience.  He received an incredible standing ovation at every screening he was able to attend!  It was really amazing to witness!

FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Lindsey Megrue, Producer THIS IS HOME

THIS IS HOME premiered at this year's Sundance Film Festival and won the Audience Award for World Cinema Documentary.  Salem Film Fest Selection Committee member Shelley Sackett had a chance to talk with producer Lindsey Megrue, ahead of THIS IS HOME's New England premiere, which will take place at The Cabot in Beverly on Friday, March 23 at 6:45pm.

SS: You have Massachusetts roots, where and when did you live here? Did that influence your becoming a documentary film producer?

LM: I spent nearly twenty years living in Dorchester, the most diverse neighborhood in Boston. Growing up surrounded by such rich diversity was very formative for me – it made me more curious, it made me want to understand other people’s lives, experiences and points of view. I truly love making documentary films because it allows me not only the great privilege of getting to know and learn from people that I might never have crossed paths within my daily life, but also the honor of helping people bring their unique stories to a larger audience.

SS: How did you get involved with THIS IS HOME?

LM: I met director Alexandra Shiva in early 2016 just as the project was green-lit. I had recently seen her film HOW TO DANCE IN OHIO, which I admired for its intimate and sensitive portrayal of a group of young people on the autism spectrum. I was thrilled to hear she wanted to make a film about Syrian refugees arriving in America in the same style – a style that allows the viewer to get to know the subjects without talking heads or experts telling you what to think or feel, but rather through simple direct human connection. While other filmmakers were examining the war and the journey out of Syria, no one seemed to be addressing what happens next. The story doesn’t end when they reach safety; in fact, it’s just beginning. Given the scale of the refugee crisis, it is vital that these types of stories be told and I wanted to be a part of making that happen.

SS: What do you hope audiences take away from the film?

LM: First and foremost, I want audiences to connect with the film’s subjects, to have a deeper understanding of their lives and see them as individuals, not statistics. Then, I hope this connection and sense of empathy will inspire people to think about what they can do at the local level in their communities to impact the refugee crisis.

SS: What are you looking forward to at Salem Film Fest?

LM: Festivals are such a wonderful way to connect with the film community. I am looking forward to meeting not just the other filmmakers, but also the festival staff, volunteers and moviegoers. Some of the best conversations I’ve had about film were while waiting in lines at festivals. It’s wonderful to be immersed with others who are passionate about films.

FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Erik Ljung, Director of THE BLOOD IS AT THE DOORSTEP

Erik Ljung is a freelance Producer and Director of Photography currently based in the midwest. He has produced content and short documentaries for the New York Times, VICE News, Al Jazeera, PBS and the Wall Street Journal.

Salem Film Fest program director Jeff Schmidt caught up Ljung ahead of THE BLOOD IS AT THE DOORSTEP's New England premiere on Friday, March 23 at 6:45 at CinemaSalem.

JS: How did you get into filmmaking?

EL: I think making videos has been apart of my life since I was about 10 years old, but I never thought a career in a creative field was a legitimate career option for me. I didn’t really start working as a filmmaker until I was in my late 20’s. Back in 2010 I took a week off of work to help some friends make a documentary that took me from Milwaukee to Boston and back. We basically just followed a local band on tour (the film ended up being very little about the band), but after that week I was hooked and knew I had to work “in the field” and not behind a desk. When I returned to work, I promptly quit without much of a plan, but I cut my teeth assisting stills photographers and shooting weddings, which eventually morphed into smaller one man band video work and went from there. My primary source of income now is from freelance DP work, mainly in video journalism and documentary work, as well as some ad agency work. I’ve found that having a hire-able skill has helped sustained creating independent projects such as THE BLOOD IS AT THE DOORSTEP. Working freelance can also get in the way of trying to make that film, but finding a balance between paying the bills and getting your project done is key.

JS: When did you become aware of the Dontre Hamilton shooting and at what point did you decide to film?

EL: I found out about the shooting the day it happened, when Dontre’s name had not even been mentioned yet. I live just a mile from the park where he was killed, and that park is literally right across the street from the job that I quit that I previously mentioned. It is the most central park in downtown Milwaukee, and it was the middle of the business day. Dontre was shot 14 times by an officer responding to a non-emergency wellness check of someone sleeping in the park. It didn’t make sense, and the number of shots was hard for people to comprehend. The day after the shooting, Dontre was labeled as a violent, mentally ill homeless person, etc. I grew up with a cousin who developed paranoid schizophrenia and is literally homeless in my hometown of Sonoma, CA. So Dontre’s story hit close to me, and the way the Chief immediately scapegoated mental illness only added to the stigma of mental illness and the families that struggle to support their loved ones struggling. Those first couple days, I knew I would do something, but wasn’t sure what.

JS: As you watch the film, it's really impressive the amount of access you gained and searched out in trying to tell the different sides of the story. How did you approach the family of Dontre Hamilton and Milwaukee Police chief Ed Flynn to participate in the film?

EL: I wanted to get involved earlier, but I had a lot of doubts about approaching the family. I had to really question myself if I was the right person to tell this story, if I could even handle the responsibility, if I would be able to see it through, and why did I want to do this story. It is extremely intimidating to approach a family going through a tragedy like this and try to explain why a documentary should be made, so you really have to question yourself if it should and if you should be the one telling it. I finally approached the family once they put themselves out in the public at their first rally at Red Arrow Park. I was introduced through mutual acquaintances, and it really began with just filming the family at rallies until we both grew comfortable with each other.

Getting access to the police department proved to be difficult because I was not affiliated with any news agency, and so I think they saw me more as being an activist than a documentary filmmaker. I did not have a lot of connections in the independent film world, so I ended up pitching portions of the story to news outlets in order to get funding to keep working on the film. It wasn’t until I started covering the case for The New York Times and Al Jazeera that the police department started to open their doors a little bit.

JS: What has the reaction to the film been by the participants?

EL: The family has been very supportive of the film. I think it is still difficult for them to watch at times, but they sit through every screening and always catch something different. The family has attended quite a bit of screenings and we have been trying to set up more community and educational screenings with them in order to connect with audiences on issues of police violence and mental health, and ways to be involved.

We screened the film at the Milwaukee Film Festival back in October, and recently held a screening for Milwaukee politicians, but Chief Flynn, nor the District Attorney or Police Union President has accepted our invitations yet. Police Chief Flynn went into early retirement in February.

JS: Your story is highly charged with emotions on all sides, as a filmmaker can you talk about your process in filming in these circumstances?

EL: In a lot of ways I was an outsider. In particular, there is a scene where a group of Milwaukee mothers who have lost sons to police violence meet in order to be supportive to one another as they fight together and individually in their sons cases. I was the only one who was not a parent in the room, the only man, and the only white person in the room. I primarily worked as a one man band in the field. Part of this was due to budgetary constraints, but more importantly  it was in order to maintain the intimacy of these situations and environments. I didn’t want people to feel like they were on a reality television show, I wanted to be as invisible as possible. I kept my mouth shut and tried to stay out of the way. They were letting me into their lives in a way that showed them at their most vulnerable, and I was fully aware of how personal these moments were. I did not deserve to be there, but the Hamilton family trusted me and were eager to have the full story out there about who Dontre was and who there family was.

JS: What role do you think documentary film can play in creating change?EL: This is the golden question and always the hardest thing to quantify. With a film like this I hope to challenge people’s assumptions, no matter what their perspective. But, how do we translate this film into real tangible action or change? I don’t want people to walk out of the theater and think of it as just a movie, or something that happened far away to someone else. The blood is on everybody’s doorstep, and it is going to take everyone to chip in and make the changes that they want to see, whether that is issues related to police violence, gun violence, or the environment. It is important to keep people informed and share information online and on social media, but it is going to take more than that. It is going to take figuring out what you are concerned about, what your skillset is, and how you can contribute. It is going to take getting out into the community. It is going to take voting in ALL of your local elections. Local elections always have very low turnouts, but are the elections that will most likely directly affect you the most.

FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Marc de Guerre, Director of BEAUTY AND RUIN

Marc de Guerre is a documentary writer and director who lives and works in Toronto, Canada. He has been making films since 2000. His films are reflective of his broad interests in the areas of popular culture, art; sexuality, and science and technology. From the murder of John Lennon, to Christian rock musicians in Nashville; from love-doll devotees in Tokyo to professional computer gamers in Seoul and the multibillion dollar ‘crisis management’ industry in LA, Washington and NY.

De Guerre's latest film, BEAUTY AND RUIN examines Detroit as it faces bankruptcy, and all assets are on the table, including the Detroit Institute of Art’s priceless collection. A struggle unfolds between the retired city workers, who want the art sold to fund their pensions and health care, and the museum, which wants to preserve the city’s cultural treasure for future generations.Salem Film Fest selection committee member Shelley Sackett caught up with de Guerre ahead of his film's East Coast premiere at the Peabody Essex Museum on Saturday, March 24 at 8:10pm.

SS: How did you get into filmmaking?

MdG: I kind of ambled my way into filmmaking. I was a painter and visual artist for a long time with a day job doing archival research for documentaries. Eventually, I just kind of fell in love with the medium and decided I'd rather be making films!

SS: How did you get involved with this project?

MdG: This project was really a labor of love project, initiated by myself. I worked on it for close to a year before I had a producer and any financing. It's a film I felt really compelled to make.

SS:Why did you feel compelled to make this film? What about the story ignited the fire in your belly?

MdG: I think it's partly growing up in Toronto. Detroit is the closest large American city by a long way (Chicago would be 2nd--but it's much further), so you kind of grow up with this awareness of this mythical American place, which is also accessible — it's just a straight shot down the highway from Toronto.The thing that really drew me to the story though, was the realization that the DIA is just this fantastically important museum totally landlocked in this city that seemed to be on a permanent downward spiral. The juxtaposition of the phenomenal beauty of the collection set against the ruin of the surrounding city just really called out to me as a filmmaker.

SS:What have been the reactions to the film by audiences?

MdG: In general, it’s been very positive overall — although as you can imagine there has been quite a bit of discussion surrounding the essentially unresolveable and intractable nature of Detroit's economic problems. Overall people are massively disposed to really feeling for the plight of the retirees.  Also, the backstory of the American acquisition of old master paintings and the rise of the American art museum seems to have really intrigued people.

SS: What do you hope audiences take away from the film?

MdG:I suppose I'd like them to think that the film is balanced in its presentation of the issues. It's such a complex and somewhat painful situation that is being depicted, and I’d like to think they would end up seeing the validity of both sides of the dilemma.

SS:Have you screened the film in a museum before? Do you think there is any irony in screening it at PEM?

MdG: It actually showed in Singapore at an art museum there! I’m really thrilled that it is screening at the art museum in Salem. I think the natural constituency for the doc is a museum going audience, so we'd love to have it shown in as many museums as possible!

SS:Has there been any reaction in Detroit?

MdG: Everyone who has seen it down there has been very supportive. I think that they find that the complexity of the issue was adequately and fairly represented. Also, on some level I think they are just happy that the story of the DIA and the bankruptcy was captured for posterity. It was a very important moment for them...

SS: What are you looking forward to at SFF?MdG:I am mainly looking forward to meeting other filmmakers and everyone from the festival, but I am also very excited to have the film screening at a historic venue like the PEM. I hope to be able to take a few hours to explore the collection!

SS:What is your next project?

MdG:I’m working on a few things, including a documentary about the son of the great painter Balthus. He is one of the great bon vivants of the 20th century, and we've been shooting together over the last few months.

FILMMAKER SPOTLIGHT: Lindsey Grayzel, Director of THE RELUCTANT RADICAL

If a crime is committed in order to prevent a greater crime, is it forgivable? Is it, in fact, necessary? THE RELUCTANT RADICAL explores these questions by following activist Ken Ward as he confronts his fears and puts himself in the direct path of the fossil fuel industry to combat climate change. Ken breaks the law as a last resort, to fulfill what he sees as his personal obligation to future generations.

Salem Film Fest Selection Committee member Shelley Sackett caught up with director Lindsey Grayzel ahead of the East Coast Premiere of THE RELUCTANT RADICAL, which will take place at 7:20pm on Sunday, March 25 at CinemaSalem.

SS: How did you get involved with this project?

LG: I met Ken in the summer of 2015 and found him to be a fascinating person who made me feel differently about climate change after our first conversation. I found his personal history compelling as he worked for over 20 years as a leader within environmental organizations and then transformed his approach to civil disobedience direct action as he realized that traditional lobbying was ineffective and far too little, too late to bring about the changes needed to avert catastrophe. When I asked him if he would agree to me making a film he readily agreed, because it was one approach he hadn’t yet tried.

SS: I understand Ken Ward's life has a Massachusetts connection?

LG: Ken lived in Massachusetts on and off for almost 30 years. He lived in Amherst from 1975-1981, in Boston from 2000-2003 and in Boston and Hull from 2006-2013.

SS: What do you hope audiences take away from the film?

LG: Ken speaks about climate change bluntly and honestly, in a way that almost everyone body else works hard to avoid doing. In fact, most of us work hard to avoid thinking about the devastation that is unfolding because it’s psychologically uncomfortable. Ken pays a price for facing it head on, and it’s his personal journey and commitment to act that I hope will challenge the audience to inspect the ways in which we are in denial about this crisis. We are not powerless to change the course ahead, yet we downplay the urgency of climate change in order to avoid our fears. I hope that audiences realize that we do indeed have power to slow down and prevent the worst case scenarios of climate change and commit themselves to joining the fight for our future.

SS: What are you looking forward to at SFF?LG: I’m most looking forward to hearing how the audience reacts to the film. So far we have had only had two public screenings, and so it still thrills me to hear a group collectively giggle or sigh during certain scenes. I’m looking forward to the Q&A because I’m curious what kinds of questions and issues the film brings up for people, and if my themes came across clearly. I’m also looking forward to connecting with other filmmakers and seeing some great films!

SS: Anything else you'd like to add?

LG: On October 11, 2016, my cameraman Carl Davis and myself were filming Ken undertake a big direct action to shut down the TransMountain tar sands oil pipeline. Ken waited for the police to arrive and we were filming to capture the scene of his arrest. To our surprise, the police then arrested us for filming and charged us with the same three felonies and misdemeanor as Ken was charged with, though we had broken no laws.

The same day my soon to be co-producer Deia Schlosberg was filming Michael Foster as he shut down the Keystone XL tar sands oil pipeline in North Dakota. She was also arrested and charged with felonies simply for filming. Our arrests contributed to the alarm that press freedom and First Amendment rights have increasingly come under attack as law enforcement and prosecutors favor corporate fossil fuel interests over citizens’ rights.  All of our charges were eventually dropped, but not before we spent time in jail, posted bail, hired lawyers to file briefs, and fought for the return of our confiscated equipment and footage.

To this day Deia has been unable to get her footage returned to her. We feel that the police and prosecutors were attempting to squelch our work and intimidate filmmakers from getting these stories told. I’m happy to say that their tactics backfired, as Deia and I then began to work together and both of us are more determined than ever to make sure these stories are told.